wingeing Pom 775 Report post Posted May 18 In going through all this old data I found M45 data taken over 3 days and totalling 21 hours. So I put the whole lot together in Maxim and this is the result. Once again it's the Sky90 array and the M26C OSC CCDs. Greg Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wingeing Pom 775 Report post Posted May 19 I found another 6 hours of data giving 27-hours in total. Greg Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wingeing Pom 775 Report post Posted May 20 It is in fact 30-hours of exposure time as all 4 datasets were 40-minute subs. I still can't find those extra 6 x 1-hour subs so maybe I just dreamt it? Anyway - here's a fractionally better reprocess. Greg Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wingeing Pom 775 Report post Posted May 22 My last revisit to this one for a while now. As per Noel Carboni's advice I went much lighter on the flattening and I also applied ZERO noise reduction. After all, with 30-hours of data you really shouldn't need noise reduction. Greg Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Radar 656 Report post Posted May 25 Wow, awesome progression. Ray 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
