Jump to content

Leaderboard


Popular Content

Showing most liked content since 08/10/2013 in all areas

  1. 5 points
    I haven't been able to collect more data as yet due mostly to wind on the few nights it's been clear so I have had a play with what I have available so far. Approx 8.5 hrs total LRGB integration, only a quick throw together in PI . Shane
  2. 5 points
    Narrowband Image of dust pillars inside the Rosette. Total exposure time 9 hours, Ha, SII and OIII @ 3hr each. Noise removal in PixInsight, colour balance and layer merging in photoshop (haven't got that far with PI yet). Image still needs to be sharpened and stars also need some attention, I'll work through these over the next couple of nights. This is about half the size of the chip at 2x2 binning, so I'm getting some good printable pics for my wall, not to mention good image scale (the C14 goes deep). Worth doing a quick comparison. Click here for a random pic of the Rosette on Google, my C14 FOV only captures what is below, you can see the image scale of the pillars in that photo on Google. So the C14 is resolving great detail IMO. However at this focal length, everything from guiding, collimation, wind, focus is torturous. Comments feedback welcome. Anyone know how to sharpen stars in PI please? Cough, Erhem, Shane, erhem, Cough. Ray
  3. 4 points
    I am going to start the ball rolling for this Christmas with a photo from my good friend Kerryn Murphy, a very keen photographer and Astronomer. Kerryn holds all rights to this photo. Having said that may I wish everyone on the Forum a very happy Christmas and Great New year from Perth Dave, Valentina and Mark. Image of Fir tree topped out by Venus. Great Stuff Kerryn
  4. 4 points
    Over 25-hours of total imaging time using 10, 20 and 30-minute subs on the Sky 90s and M26C OSC CCDs Greg
  5. 4 points
    And here's the Digital Sundial working for real out in the garden this morning. Compass to point North and protractor to set up latitude Greg
  6. 4 points
    Here is an NB image with no luminance added yet. About 3 hours per channel. Took a while to accumulate all the data and I throw away quite a bit that doesn't cut the mustard. I use CCD Inspector on every sub frame that comes in and I make live focus adjustments throughout the imaging run to ensure focus stays tack sharp. I do PA, collimation before every imaging run these days. My pier will suffer from PA drift as well due to temperature changes at the FL of 4 metres, but I'm overcoming all these challenges and loving it. Admittedly once the observatory is open, I do most of my AP from the couch with Teamviewer on my iPhone. There are some beautiful foreground dark nebulae (top centre, left and right sides and lower left) that come out well because of the bright background. I've done this object before in RGB but never in NB and never up this close, but I'm impressed with how active and dynamic the object is. I could still probably tighten up those stars and reduce the red halos but I'm happy with the result. C&C's welcome as always. Ray
  7. 4 points
    Noel Carboni added another 9 x 40-minutes to the previous data: Greg
  8. 4 points
    Hi all, Thought I'd give this a go to try a few things as I rattle my brain trying to remember imaging. This planetary is way too small for my set-up. I know it's not centred and far from great, but I just wanted to check the edges of the image using a basic star field with a bonus small object. Plus I've never looked at this object either. I'm going to try my 0.85x focal reducer to see if it helps or makes the edges worse. At least the guiding seemed to be alright. Dan
  9. 4 points
    Narrowband image shot with QHY9M.
  10. 4 points
    Hi all, Been a long time. New hobby of fatherhood has been consuming. But anyway...trying to get back into it. Here's my first attempt for ages. I've discovered a few issues. My memory for starters. Plus a bit of focal tilt. Got some time off work to sort out though. Sorry - Not sure how to upload a better quality pic either. What's the max file size again? My original sizes are approx. 350,000 KB. Talk soon, Dan.
  11. 4 points
    This panorama depicts the emission nebula along the edge of one of Milky Way's giant molecular clouds, is part of a larger mosaic which can be viewed here Imaging telescope or lens: Vixen VSD 100 f/3 Imaging camera: Sony ICX814 Mount: Software Bisque Paramount MX Guiding telescope or lens: Vixen VSD Guiding camera: sx loadstar Software: Sequence Generator Pro, Photoshop CS5, PixInsight 1.8, PHD Filters: Chroma OIII 3nm, Chroma Ha 3nm Locations: Home observatory, Valencia, Spain
  12. 4 points
    It's been some time since I have visited (something like 4 years or there abouts). I thought I might post one of my recent images of the Eagle Nebula. Taken in NB and RGB wash. Only 12 hours in total but acceptable levels of noise in my opinion. Click here for large resolution image.
  13. 4 points
    Got bored of not getting any practice in with the moon so prominent at the moment so shot a quick 30 sec of each LRGB Shane
  14. 3 points
    The old NEQ6 has been sold and moved into her new home. The new owner is absolutely loving it and having a ball learning to drive it, as evidenced by the numerous messages I get on a daily/nightly basis. Like myself, Leon, the new owner, has made a huge leap in equipment coming from a EQ2/3 to a goto mount. I well remember the overwhelming feeling with such a huge jump in technology. Shane
  15. 3 points
    Here's the reprocessed image using up to date calibration files. The two bright red stars over to the left are both Carbon Stars. Greg
  16. 3 points
  17. 3 points
    I think it has something to do with the Moon being upside down at your place Greg
  18. 3 points
    Only 4 x 30-min subs so tons of noise, and I can't use statistics to get rid of plane trails when 2 of the 4 subs has a plane on it However, what this does show me is that if I ever see a clear sky again I need to get a lot more hors with the 200mm lenses on this region. Greg
  19. 3 points
    When I was in the Norfolk County Constabulary, (1957 - 1968) standing outside the Norwich Gates at Sandringham House for 4 hours at a time and within the grounds, surrounded by 6ft drifts of snow it was not amusing, especially when the Superintendent in Charge of Sandringham Division (Lt Col R B Mitchell) drove up in his heated car, winding the window down and saying ..."But think of the honour chap!" I spent 9 Christmases and many other occasions at Sandringham House being one of the "honoured" chosen few. Dave
  20. 3 points
    Clear from 7:30 until 9:00 p.m. last night, intrusive Moon, so went for Ceres. 18 x 15-minute subs from the Sky 90 array. Will go for this again tonight if it is clear even though the Moon will be even worse. Greg
  21. 3 points
    Very quick and very dirty process of current target, NGC 1365. approx 9hrs integration RGB. Still need Luminance data but needed to see progress as I haven't done any processing for a while. Shane
  22. 3 points
    From 15/02/2018 here are 36 x 10-minute subs on the Sky 90 array of beautiful blue star Gomeisa (Beta Canis Majoris). The averaged data shows a nice bright asteroid near centre (not visible in this SDMask stacked image which is used to get rid of the hot pixels). Greg
  23. 3 points
    It just doesn't get any better than this for my locale. Almost, got the Enke division. I may try stacking less frames just to see if I can get a little more detail. Same image, just displayed differently. With the ZWO ASI120mm. Tim.
  24. 3 points
    Zoom-In - Single frame original Hyperstar on a C11 with an H9C OSC CCD. Zoom-Out - Single frame Sky 90 with an M25C OSC CCD.
  25. 3 points
    Joke right? No such thing as a digital sundial, or is there? Just 3D printed out this little beauty. Shows 10:20 when it was actually 10:23 and shows mid-day when it was spot-on mid-day. Resolution of the sundial is 20-minutes with the printer at its highest resolution of 0.1mm. Greg
  26. 3 points
    The brightest star in the sky together with the brightest star in the Northern Hemisphere Greg
  27. 3 points
    The missus brought these home for dinner. But as they are such a beautiful example of fractals in Nature they had to get macro'd first Here we have the wonderful Romanesco Broccoli. Greg
  28. 3 points
    And here's the 3D print collection so far Greg
  29. 3 points
    Zoom-In - Original Hyperstar on a C11 with an H9C OSC CCD. Zoom-Out - Single frame Sky 90 with M25C OSC CCD plus H-alpha and SII narrowband data. Greg
  30. 3 points
    Zoom In - Original Hyperstar and H9C OSC CCD Zoom out - 2 frame mosaic Canon 200mm lenses and M26C OSC CCDs. Greg
  31. 3 points
    I've got heaps of reptiles where I live. Mostly good ones. But every winter I have to save many of these marbled geckos in my firewood. My little daughter and I gathered quite a few on this occasion and relocated them to another old tree stump with lots of hides and moisture. They are slow and sleepy this time of year. They are so cute. But have to be careful as they drop their tail in defence. I was told their tail is the source that gets them through winter without the need to eat. Summer is a completely different story. So many jacky dragons, lace monitors, brown and black snakes and even turtles, yet, hardly see these geckos.
  32. 3 points
    Carbon star in Taurus. 5 hours of 10-minute subs with the Sky 90 array. Greg
  33. 3 points
    This is a 2-framer with the Canon 200mm lenses and the M26C 10-Megapixel OSC CCDs. So this is a BIG field of view. Just flattened this image using new flattening software that Noel Carboni is about to release. I tell you this software is REALLY impressive and REALLY fast too Greg
  34. 3 points
    As I had the full 11.5 hours for IC2087 it made sense to remake the 2-framer with the 10-hour frame to the right. So the new process Taurus Molecular Cloud image - all 21.5 hours of it - now looks like this. Greg
  35. 3 points
    This one has taken a bit a work. About 25 hours of narrowband and luminance all up. Because of my F11 focal ratio the signal to noise is low, so I need to acquire massive amounts of data to get smooth results. The long focal length mountain has really grown on me though, I really love getting up close to these things. The full scale image is 3177 pixels across and looks good IMO. Apart from the four major plumes of dust and gas that I've framed this photo on, the"EGGs" (evaporative gaseous globules) floating centre top and far right are what I really enjoy catching. Every star in that photo (and in the universe) first started off as one of those obscure looking EGGs, until gravity took hold. Low res jpeg below and also a higher resolution tiff file below. Eagle Nebula MASA.tif Comments welcome. Ray
  36. 3 points
    And here is a video of the 10 p.m. ISS pass last night taken with the Canon 5D MkII and a 15mm fisheye lens. Couldn't take any stills of a few seconds duration as it was far too light. The ISS will be clearly visible to the centre right about 1-minute in. The ISS exits top left. Turn off the annoying audio
  37. 3 points
    A 5-minute pass this time, caught this side of the cloud bank moving in from the West. Greg
  38. 3 points
    Yes Tim. In fact I have the following EOS film 300 500 1000 1nHS EOS digital 500d 750d PS A75 and A520 I recently sold my 350d Also in the bag Olympus OM1n Pentax sp500 and PZ film Last but not least Kodak Box Brownie 120 Dave From my Kobo tablet:
  39. 3 points
    Nice one ! I have been watching them getting closer, but timing was all wrong at night so missed out. Nights getting cooler here and not conducive to crawled out of the sack !! Dave
  40. 3 points
    Jupiter came pretty close to a 12-day old Moon last night Main image is a fisheye lens view over the New Forest Observatories, and the inset top/left is the telescope view. I was amazed to see the Moons of Jupiter when I hit the curves on the telescope view, didn't realise I would pick those up as well - live & learn Greg
  41. 3 points
    Got this last night (09/03/2017) around 8:20 p.m. at the New Forest Observatory. Photobombed by a military helicopter which was tailing another military helicopter that had NO LIGHTS showing!! Greg
  42. 3 points
    Here's a piccie for tomorrow Greg
  43. 3 points
    An extremely quick process of last night's data (I didn't even remove the plane trails) as I was itching to see what I'd caught. 18 x 40-minute subs (yes that's 40-minutes!!) using the Sky 90 array. It brought out more of the faint stuff in the area than I have managed to get before with my kit Greg
  44. 3 points
    Got a couple more hours on IC2087 with the Canon 200mm lenses last night. Still needs a LOT more data to get the noise down. Not sure if I will get more on this or move onto something else. Or even, get more Sky 90 data on it. Decisions, decisions. Greg
  45. 3 points
    Eta (blue) and Zeta (orange) Aurigae. 5 and a half hours of 5-minute subs on the Sky 90 array: Eta (blue) and Zeta (orange) Aurigae by Greg Parker, on Flickr Greg
  46. 3 points
  47. 3 points
  48. 3 points

    From the album Paul C Swift

    Finally complete after seven nights of photography: Sh2-119 the defuse emission nebular in Cygnus only a few degrees away from the North America Nebula. The object consists mostly of hydrogen, with some sulfur-II and faint amounts of oxygen-III. This is a two panel mosaic. Imaging telescope or lens: Vixen VSD 100 f/3 Imaging camera: Sony ICX814 Mount: Software Bisque Paramount MX Guiding telescope or lens: Vixen VSD Guiding camera: sx loadstar Software: Sequence Generator Pro, Photoshop CS5, PixInsight 1.8, PHD
  49. 3 points
    I need to brush up on my narrow band imaging processing (more like learn how to do it). This is 40 minutes each through Ha, OIII and SII. I've tried to reduce the star bloating in photoshop a bit. I'll gather more data (once these storms clear again Shane!), and keep tweaking the final product. Overall, I'm happy with the result considering how out of practice I am. I've got a luminance channel to add to it later. Feedback on reducing star bloating and removing the red hue from the background (and anything else) welcome. Ray
  50. 3 points
    Most, (I think) are feeding their egos on FB. Almost no one explains the images they post, people who know absolutley nothing about what they are looking at are 'ooohing and awwing' their pics like they work for NASA. Everyone's an expert, noone offers suggestions to the poster on how to make their images better, details are non-existent on what they did /used, I could go on and on with my personal OP, but somehow it seems counter productive. I like this site, (the much needed remodel especially.) I like the current 'active' members and I will continue to post, comment/contribute and be an occasional pain in the arse. I get around to several other 'genuine' astronomy forums, (mostly lurking) but I've also noticed a fall off in posts in general (by date/time etc.) nearly everywhere. Tim.
×