Jump to content


Popular Content

Showing most liked content since 11/04/2021 in all areas

  1. 2 points
    Incredible Prof. To think we only see a small amount of our galaxy's stars. Astronomy is pretty cool Ray
  2. 1 point
    Wow, that resolution (fine detail) is incredible. Ray
  3. 1 point
    Geeeeesuuuuzzz!!!! Lovely remnant Professor. You really catch some faint wispy detail that lingers out there. Ray
  4. 1 point
    I was checking out an old 200mm lens image of the Caph region and when I zoomed right in to see individual stars I realised I hadn't seen an image like this before. So here, for you to see "The stars like dust" is a highly cropped region in Cassiopeia Greg
  5. 1 point
    As I stare at that, it reminds me of a birds eye view of a phospholipid bilayer (don't ask, science is a rabbit hole). Ray
  6. 1 point
    Here's a bigger bit to drool over Greg
  7. 1 point
    A beautiful (extremely rare) clear and Moonless night last night - so I was out until 3:00 a.m. this morning Two jobs on the go, Hyperstar imaging the Pleiades in the South Dome, and polar aligning and setting up in the North Dome. I will start with the North Dome antics. I am using Sharpcap for polar aligning and it was less than a 30-minute job to get "Excellent" alignment in the South Dome. In the North Dome it was giving me nothing but trouble. Last night I actually packed up and gave in before pulling myself together and going out again to sort the bastard out. At some times I would get plate solved, at other times I would get intermittent plate solving, and at yet other times the bloody thing would not plate solve AT ALL. By times I really should say ANGLES. So what was happening? Like an idiot I have 2 apple trees too close to the observatory in the North, no problem with stuff to the North, unless of course you need to see Polaris for Sharpcap polar alignment. Still no great problem, all I have to do is take the top off the apple trees and I'll still see Polaris OK as it is well above the roof of the house. So a couple of weeks back I took the top off both apple trees and thought everything was O.K. But I see in the cold light of day, that I didn't take enough off the top of one of the trees, and it was at that angle (of the mount) that the polar aligning plate solving was failing. Well in the end I managed to work around the offending branches and finally got "Excellent" polar alignment - PHEW! Whilst I was playing these games in the North Dome I was imaging the Pleiades in the South Dome with the Hyperstar 4. The image shows 27 x 3-minute subs with the HS4. The result is VERY interesting. It is NOT perticularly deep, but it is EXACTLY the depth I would expect from (the equivalent) 15-minute subs from the Sky90s. Now it took 1-hour exposures from the Sky90s to show the Taurus molecular clouds in the region which equates to 12-minute subs on the Hyperstar 4. So the final experiment I am going to do on the HS 4 to finally bring this all together in a way I can understand, will be to take 5, 10 and 15-minute subs with the HS 4 and check out the resulting depth of the images. I'm pretty sure I know what I'm going to see - but it would be great if the experiment confirms. One massive bonus from this HS4 - no ghost flares from bright stars!! Yipeeeeee!!!!! Greg
  8. 1 point
    The idea is WAY better than the reality Ray. I find it very difficult (typical male can't multitask). Greg
  9. 1 point
    The spikes look epic. I love the idea of two domes running at the same time. Ray
  10. 1 point
    They look red enough to be Carbon stars but they're not. North Dome now also sorted Here's a crop to square and add some star spikes version. Greg
  11. 1 point
    Loads of detail. Didn't spot the asterism, it doesn't really 'pop' out unless I cross my eyes, rub my belly and pat my head....Looks like the South dome is pretty well sorted. Well done. It's been so long since I did any LEA, I doubt I even remember how. Is that a couple of carbon stars just of center toward the top of the image? Good luck with the North dome! Tim
  12. 1 point
    Did you spot the 3 asterism??